There are no items in your cart
Add More
Add More
Item Details | Price |
---|
While some believe it is a good idea to have a uniform system of law for the entire world, others believe that nations must have their own bodies and sets of regulations. I shall discuss both views before concluding, though I concur with the thought that countries should have individual systems of law that can cater to their individual needs.
On the one hand, some are in favour of bringing the whole world under a uniform code of conduct. Such a system may lead to more connectivity and uniformity, leading to a similar way of thinking. Ultimately, the world can act as a unit. In addition, the uniform law enforcement and judicial systems can benefit from the participation of the best lawmakers from the world.
On the other hand, some sternly believe that each nation must implement its system of law and order. It is because each nation is different, and they have some unique set of challenges.
In addition, there are extreme cultural differences and a wide gap in social norms, along with political differences, leading to a need for different ways of governance. For example, in some parts of the world, wearing a veil on the female face is part of the culture, and the maximum proportion of the population follows it with some laws in implementation around it, while in other parts, such traditions are alien. It is senseless to have uniform codes of conduct and law enforcement in areas and civilizations with such vast differences.
I believe law and judiciary are reflections of a society, its social norms, political setup, and culture. These regulatory bodies fail if they do not consider the local sociopolitical and traditional aspects. Sometimes, these differences may be present between units far smaller than a country; in these cases, there must be a variation in the systems applied in these places. Nonetheless, each can learn a few good factors from others. Finally, a uniformity to
Swaatii Sehgal