Many people argue that restaurants should be required to disclose the nutritional information of the dishes they serve. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?


There has been a rising concern over the quality of food intake people have been having; consequently, many believe eateries should disclose the data regarding the nutrients in the food items. I shall analyze if such a step can be more beneficial or not.

There can be multiple usefulnesses of printing the nutritional information of food served at restaurants. Firstly, the food we eat is vital, so it is only morally appropriate to publish information related to food being served as there have been some upsurge in people eating out, and there have been more health worries than before. Secondly, sometimes it has been seen that certain food items are sold on the pretext of these dishes being healthy, while in reality, it is not so; however, by passing on the nutritional information, more accountability can be ensured; thus, guaranteeing only healthy edibles are served with this tag.

On the other hand, there may be some disadvantages for restaurants in publishing nutrition-related information or a list of nutrients with every single dish on the food menu of a restaurant. An eating joint may not wish to disclose too much information about their recipes, for it may harm their commercial wellbeing. Secondly, restaurants are under pressure of cooking tasty food leading to them resorting to using not-so-desirable or healthful methods of cooking. Even most visitors visit to eat delectable food and not anything beneficial for health.

I believe the restaurants must be ordered to present the vital nutritional information regarding the food so that guests may take an informed decision and select what is most appropriate for them. Finally, I would like to reiterate the advantages certainly outweigh the disadvantages for people’s health should be of chief importance to a community and people themselves.

Swaatii Sehgal